The GTM balance that separates winners from wannabes
Most GTM problems don’t stem from bad ideas. They come from imbalance.
The strategy theatre trap
I’ve watched teams spend months crafting beautiful positioning decks. Detailed competitive analyses. Elegant brand frameworks that would make McKinsey proud (but not make any $$$).
Then nothing moves.
The strategy is sound, but the tactical playbook reads like academic theory. Email sequences that sound like white papers. Sales decks that explain the market but don’t close deals. Content that impresses peers but doesn’t convert prospects.
Strategy without execution becomes theatre. Impressive to watch, but it doesn’t drive pipeline.
The execution hamster wheel
The opposite extreme is equally deadly. Teams sprint on cold outreach campaigns, paid ad experiments, and nurture flow optimizations. Activity becomes the metric. Motion feels like progress.
But without clear strategic direction, every tactic feels diluted. Your outreach sounds like everyone else’s because you haven’t defined what makes you different. Your ads generate clicks but not qualified pipeline because you’re targeting symptoms, not root causes.
Execution without strategy becomes a hamster wheel. Lots of energy, no forward movement.
What balance actually looks like
The teams that break through don’t swing between extremes. They balance both sides of the GTM equation simultaneously:
Positioning and channels. Your differentiated story must match where your audience actually discovers solutions. A contrarian positioning strategy that lives only in sales decks is worthless if your prospects find alternatives through SEO.
Narrative and nurture. Your brand story should flow seamlessly into your email sequences, sales conversations, and product onboarding. Every touchpoint should reinforce the same differentiated thesis.
Strategy and execution. Your tactical choices should ladder up to strategic positioning. Your strategic decisions should inform which tactics get resources and which get cut.
Not over-indexed one way or the other. Not divorced from reality.
Need help finding the right mix in your GTM? Join companies like Ahrefs, Common Room, Fiverr, Strapi, FullEnrich, Toast, and many more who I’ve already worked with.
The feedback loop that changes everything
Here’s what most teams miss: it’s not a one-way flow from strategy to execution.
Every channel you run feeds insights back into your strategy. SEO reveals which problems prospects actually search for. Paid ads show which messaging resonates at scale. Sales calls expose the real objections your positioning needs to address.
That feedback loop is where GTM excellence lives. Strategy informs execution, execution refines strategy, and the entire system gets sharper over time.
Teams that master this balance don’t just avoid the extremes. They create a virtuous cycle where every tactical win makes their strategy more precise, and every strategic insight makes their tactics more effective.
The tactical test: Does your current execution clearly reflect your strategic differentiation? If someone experienced your touchpoints blind, would they understand what makes you different?
The strategic test: Do your positioning decisions directly inform which tactics get resources and which get cut? Can you draw clear lines from your core thesis to your channel investments?
Most teams fail one test or the other. The winners pass both.